[PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: enable ethernet support

[Andrew Lunn]

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:42:36PM +0800, Ziyang Huang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc at outlook.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
> index e502a3ecf4b7..b36e5c2136b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
> @@ -94,6 +94,63 @@ soc: soc at 0 {
>  		#size-cells = <1>;
>  		ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>  
> +		mdio0: mdio at 88000 {
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq5018-mdio", "qcom,qca-mdio";
> +			reg = <0x88000 0x64>;
> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_GEPHY_MDC_SW_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_GEPHY_DSP_HW_ARES>;

What do these two resets do? An MDIO bus controller is unlikely to
have a DSP in it. That is something a PHY is more likely to have. An
MDIO bus controller does have an MDC line, but why is it
GCC_GEPHY_MDC_SW_ARES not GCC_MDIO_MDC_SW_ARES? So this again makes me
think this is a PHY reset, so should be in the PHY node.

A device tree binding will help sort this out.


    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr