[PATCH net v2 2/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix trapping frames with multiple CPU ports on MT7530
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Tue Jun 13 13:29:34 PDT 2023
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:09:02 +0300 Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> >> It's a new capability that nobody has used, yet, so YMMV :)
> >
> > Interesting, I've got some questions regarding this.
> >
> >> For example to mark a series as Changes Requested one needs to send
> >> the following line anywhere in the email thread:
> >>
> >> pw-bot: changes-requested
> >
> > I suppose a reply to the cover letter or under the cover letter thread
> > applies?
Anywhere in the thread, the bot should walk references.
> >> The use of the bot is restricted to authors of the patches (the From:
> >> header on patch submission and command must match!)
> >
> > So, for example, if this patch series was new, Vladimir would reply to
> > the patch they're the author of with 'pw-bot: changes-requested', and
> > the patchworks would mark the whole patch series as changes requested?
Yes.
> Also, replying with 'pw-bot: changes-requested' on an already accepted
> patch series as the author won't change the state from accepted to
> changes requested, correct?
Yes, authors can only changes status from active to inactive. Accepted
is an inactive state.
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list