[PATCH net v2 2/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix trapping frames with multiple CPU ports on MT7530
Arınç ÜNAL
arinc.unal at arinc9.com
Tue Jun 13 12:09:02 PDT 2023
On 13.06.2023 22:03, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 13.06.2023 21:12, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:58:33 +0300 Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>> Ok. I see Russell has commented on v4, though I don't see that he
>>>> particularly
>>>> pointed out that this fixes a problem which isn't yet a problem. I
>>>> got lost in
>>>> all the versions. v2 and v3 are out of my inbox now :)
>>>
>>> All good, I had to quickly roll v3 as v2 had wrong author information
>>> and I couldn't risk getting v2 applied.
>>
>> FWIW you can reply with pw-bot: changes-requested to your own patches
>> and the bot should discard them from patchwork.
>>
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#updating-patch-status
>>
>> It's a new capability that nobody has used, yet, so YMMV :)
>
> Interesting, I've got some questions regarding this.
>
>> For example to mark a series as Changes Requested one needs to send
>> the following line anywhere in the email thread:
>>
>> pw-bot: changes-requested
>
> I suppose a reply to the cover letter or under the cover letter thread
> applies?
>
>> The use of the bot is restricted to authors of the patches (the From:
>> header on patch submission and command must match!)
>
> So, for example, if this patch series was new, Vladimir would reply to
> the patch they're the author of with 'pw-bot: changes-requested', and
> the patchworks would mark the whole patch series as changes requested?
Also, replying with 'pw-bot: changes-requested' on an already accepted
patch series as the author won't change the state from accepted to
changes requested, correct?
Arınç
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list