[PATCH v16 4/8] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys0

[Matthias Brugger]

On 30/03/2022 12:04, Jason-JH Lin wrote:
> Hi CK,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 13:39 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
>> Hi, Jason:
>>
>> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 13:03 +0800, Jason-JH Lin wrote:
>>> Hi CK,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reviews.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 11:28 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
>>>> Add mt8195 vdosys0 clock driver name and routing table to
>>>> the driver data of mtk-mmsys.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin at mediatek.com>
>>>> Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
>>>> angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Impelmentation patch of vdosys1 can be refered to [1]
>>>>
>>>> [1] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys1
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h    | 130
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c       |  11 +++
>>>>   include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h |   9 ++
>>>>   3 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
>>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
>>>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..24a3afe23bc8
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H
>>>> +#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H
>>>> +
>>>> +#define MT8195_VDO0_OVL_MOUT_EN					
>>>> 0xf14
>>>> +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_RDMA0			
>>>> BIT(0)
>>>> +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_WDMA0			
>>>> BIT(1)
>>>>   
>>>> Useless, so remove.
>>>>
>>>> +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_OVL1			
>>>> BIT(2)
>>>> Ditto.Useless, so remove.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> CK
>>>
>>> Although these definitions are not used, they represent the
>>> functionality provided by this register.
>>>
>>> I think we can show that we have these capabilities by defining
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Can we keep these definitions?
>>
>> It's better that we know how to use it. Even though the symbol name
>> show some information, but I would like to add it to
>> mmsys_mt8195_routing_table[].
>>
>> Regards,
>> CK
>>
> 
> OK, I think I just remove the useless define.

Actually I would prefer to add it to the routing table to describe all the 
capabilities of the HW.

Is there any technical problem with that?

Regards,
Matthias

> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Jason-JH.Lin
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jason-JH.Lin
>>>
>>>> +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_RDMA1			
>>>> BIT(4)
>>>> +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_WDMA1			
>>>> BIT(5)
>>>> +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_OVL0			
>>>> BIT(6)
>>>
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>
>>