[PATCH v16 4/8] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys0

[Jason-JH Lin]

Hi CK,

Thanks for the review.

On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 13:39 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Jason:
> 
> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 13:03 +0800, Jason-JH Lin wrote:
> > Hi CK,
> > 
> > Thanks for the reviews.
> > 
> > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 11:28 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
> > > Add mt8195 vdosys0 clock driver name and routing table to
> > > the driver data of mtk-mmsys.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin at mediatek.com>
> > > Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > > angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > > Impelmentation patch of vdosys1 can be refered to [1]
> > > 
> > > [1] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys1
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h    | 130
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c       |  11 +++
> > >  include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h |   9 ++
> > >  3 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..24a3afe23bc8
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H
> > > +#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H
> > > +
> > > +#define MT8195_VDO0_OVL_MOUT_EN					
> > > 0xf14
> > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_RDMA0			
> > > BIT(0)
> > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_WDMA0			
> > > BIT(1)
> > >  
> > > Useless, so remove.
> > > 
> > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_OVL1			
> > > BIT(2)
> > > Ditto.Useless, so remove.
> > > Regards,
> > > CK
> > 
> > Although these definitions are not used, they represent the
> > functionality provided by this register.
> > 
> > I think we can show that we have these capabilities by defining
> > them.
> > 
> > Can we keep these definitions?
> 
> It's better that we know how to use it. Even though the symbol name
> show some information, but I would like to add it to
> mmsys_mt8195_routing_table[].
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 

OK, I think I just remove the useless define.
Thanks.

Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jason-JH.Lin
> > 
> > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_RDMA1			
> > > BIT(4)
> > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_WDMA1			
> > > BIT(5)
> > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_OVL0			
> > > BIT(6)
> > 
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> 
> 
-- 
Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin at mediatek.com>