[PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node

[Matthias Brugger]

On 14/06/17 03:11, Jun Gao wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 13/06/17 15:23, Jun Gao wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao at mediatek.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao at mediatek.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>      arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>      arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi    | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>      2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Matthias,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you take this patch together with
>>>>>>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss
>>>>>> something?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]?
>>>>>
>>>>> "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
>>>>> "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
>>>>> "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
>>>>> "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
>>>>> "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding
>>>> description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Dear Matthias,
>>>
>>> I mean fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description. Is it OK?
>>>
>>
>> Then I can't see the difference between what you are asking for and what
>> is already pushed to the repository. Please send a patch, that will make
>> things clearer.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
> 
> Dear Matthias,
> 
> like this:
> 
> diff:
>   Required properties:
>     - compatible: value should be either of the following.
> -      (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
> -      (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
> -      (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c.
> -      (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c.
> -      (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
> +       "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
> MT2701
> +       "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
> +       "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
> +       "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
> MT7623
> +       "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
>     - reg: physical base address of the controller and dma base, length
> of memory
>       mapped region.
>     - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu.
> 

Please look at [2], this is already staged.

[2] 
https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1