[PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node

[Jun Gao]

On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 13/06/17 15:23, Jun Gao wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao at mediatek.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao at mediatek.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>     arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>     arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi    | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>     2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
> >>>> [...]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear Matthias,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could you take this patch together with
> >>>>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss
> >>>> something?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2
> >>>> [2]
> >>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
> >>>
> >>> Dear Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]?
> >>>
> >>> "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
> >>> "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
> >>> "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
> >>> "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
> >>> "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>
> >> You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding
> >> description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> > 
> > Dear Matthias,
> > 
> > I mean fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description. Is it OK?
> > 
> 
> Then I can't see the difference between what you are asking for and what 
> is already pushed to the repository. Please send a patch, that will make 
> things clearer.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias

Dear Matthias,

like this:

diff:
 Required properties:
   - compatible: value should be either of the following.
-      (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
-      (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
-      (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c.
-      (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c.
-      (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
+       "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
MT2701
+       "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
+       "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
+       "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
MT7623
+       "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
   - reg: physical base address of the controller and dma base, length
of memory
     mapped region.
   - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu.


Thanks!