[PATCH V3 08/11] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: remove pwrap_is_mt8135() and pwrap_is_mt8173()

[Matthias Brugger]

On 01/02/16 12:00, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 01/02/2016 11:55, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25/01/16 10:53, John Crispin wrote:
>>> With ore SoCs being added the list of helper functions like these would
>>
>> The commit message is something strange:
>> "With every new SoC being added..." maybe?
>>
>>> grow. While at it also add a new flag "bridge" and use that insted of
>>
>> s/insted/instead
>>
>>> pwrap_is_mt8173() where appropriate.
>
> you are lookign at V3 of the series, V4 has this fix done already
>
> [...]
>
>
>>>        }
>>> @@ -830,6 +824,7 @@ static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8135 = {
>>>        .int_en_all = BIT(31) | BIT(1),
>>>        .spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
>>>        .wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL,
>>> +    .has_bridge = 1,
>>>        .init_reg_clock = pwrap_mt8135_init_reg_clock,
>>>        .init_special = pwrap_mt8135_init_special,
>>>    };
>>
>> Please set has_bridge explicitly for mt8173.
>
> I dont get it. the original code never did that.
>

has_bridge was introduced by this patch, but you don't set it explicitly 
to 0 in pwrap_mt8173.

Just as I see it, please try to write a summary to every new version of 
a patch set which explains what you changed between one version and 
another. This will help a lot making the review easier.

Thanks,
Matthias