[PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: vchan: add vchan_chan_name() to get channel device name

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 11:26:37AM +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> On 9/4/26 11:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 04:53:11PM -0400, Frank.Li at oss.nxp.com wrote:
> > 
> > > Introduce vchan_chan_name() to obtain the DMA channel device name.
> > > 
> > > Use a dedicated helper instead of directly accessing dma_chan::dev
> > > so callers remain unaffected by an upcoming rename of the struct member.
> > 
> > LGTM,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > >   		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, chan->irq,
> > >   				       stm32_dma_chan_irq, 0,
> > > -				       dev_name(chan2dev(chan)), chan);
> > > +				       vchan_chan_name(&chan->vchan), chan);
> > >   		if (ret) {
> > >   			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > >   				"request_irq failed with err %d channel %d\n",
> > 
> > This one...
> > 
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/stm32/stm32-dma3.c
> > 
> > >   		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, chan->irq, stm32_dma3_chan_irq, 0,
> > > -				       dev_name(chan2dev(chan)), chan);
> > > +				       vchan_chan_name(&chan->vchan), chan);
> > >   		if (ret) {
> > >   			dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to request channel %s IRQ\n",
> > > -				      dev_name(chan2dev(chan)));
> > > +				      vchan_chan_name(&chan->vchan));
> > >   			goto err_clk_disable;
> > 
> > ...and this one are duplicate messages as devm_request*irq() printsr
> > most of the information.
> > 
> > Not sure if there will be a patch to simply drop them.
> 
> It was the purpose of this series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260709135846.97972-1-panchuang@vivo.com/

Yes, thanks. My point is (independently on who contributes that patch) that
the piece above may be an unneeded churn due to messages are going to be
removed. It all relies if that series (a.k.a. patch that removes messages)
goes first.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko