[RFC PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add initial pSMMU realm viommu plumbing
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at kernel.org
Tue Sep 1 03:06:37 PDT 2026
Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at kernel.org> writes:
> Nicolin Chen <nicolinc at nvidia.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 02:23:31PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
...
>> .. and we demand userspace (VMM) to use IOMMU_VIOMMU_ALLOC ioctl,
>> even if VMM does not actually expose a guest-level SMMU instance.
>> Thus, no user_data.
>>
>> I can get the reasoning behind the flow using this viommu/vdevice.
>>
>> But, on the other hand, I can imagine that a Realm VSMMU would add
>> a new flag with a user_data to this VIOMMU. Then, this flow would
>> give some troubles to VMM (QEMU for example):
>>
>> - For VM with a guest-level SMMU, QEMU creates a realm instance
>> where IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3 (with vsmmu) can be
>> allocated.
>> - For VM w/o a guest-level SMMU, QEMU won't create such a realm
>> instance, while still required to invoke the ioctl (w/o vsmmu).
>>
>> Taking a step back, I wonder if we really need to use iommufd for
>> PSMMU activation and its stream table allocations?
>>
>> Here are some facts:
>> - An iommufd has a ctx, that's one per VM. Similarly, a Realm
>> has an RD.
>> - For an RMI command that needs an RD, it makes sense to be per
>> iommufd ctx, e.g. RMI_VSMMU_* or RMI_VDEV_* commands.
>> - PSMMU commands are global; they don't need RD. So they don't
>> seem necessary to tie to an iommufd ctx.
>>
>> Instead, could the PSMMU activation be done after RMI_PSMMU_INFO
>> check? Is there any reason not to do that? A safer timing might
>> be at the device assignment stage?
>>
>
> One of the reasons I added IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3 was to
> avoid creating a psmmu object when we are not using a PCI passthrough
> VM. That is also the reason for all the refcounting around the psmmu
> objects.
>
> If we are okay with creating psmmu objects early, then I guess we can go
> with the above approach.
>
How about?
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
@@ -437,9 +437,6 @@
if (viommu_type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3)
return VIOMMU_STRUCT_SIZE(struct arm_vsmmu, core);
- if (viommu_type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3)
- return VIOMMU_STRUCT_SIZE(struct arm_vsmmu, core);
-
if (!smmu->impl_ops || !smmu->impl_ops->get_viommu_size)
return 0;
return smmu->impl_ops->get_viommu_size(viommu_type);
@@ -463,14 +460,13 @@
vsmmu->vmid = s2_parent->s2_cfg.vmid;
if (viommu->type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3) {
+ if (arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(viommu))
+ return arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(viommu, user_data);
+
viommu->ops = &arm_vsmmu_ops;
return 0;
}
- if (viommu->type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3)
- return arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(viommu, user_data);
-
-
return smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_init(vsmmu, user_data);
}
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-realm.c
@@ -239,21 +239,27 @@
return 0;
}
+bool arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm;
+
+ if (!viommu->kvm_file)
+ return false;
+
+ kvm = viommu->kvm_file->private_data;
+ return kvm_is_realm(kvm);
+}
+
int arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
const struct iommu_user_data *user_data)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct kvm *kvm;
struct rmi_psmmu_params *params;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu =
container_of(viommu->iommu_dev, struct arm_smmu_device, iommu);
unsigned long rmi_ret;
- if (!viommu->kvm_file)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- kvm = viommu->kvm_file->private_data;
- if (!kvm_is_realm(kvm))
+ if (!arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(viommu))
return -EINVAL;
if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RME))
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -4515,8 +4515,6 @@
int ret;
mutex_init(&smmu->streams_mutex);
- mutex_init(&smmu->realm.mutex);
- refcount_set(&smmu->realm.users, 0);
smmu->streams = RB_ROOT;
ret = arm_smmu_init_queues(smmu);
@@ -5578,6 +5576,8 @@
return -ENODEV;
}
+ mutex_init(&smmu->realm.mutex);
+ refcount_set(&smmu->realm.users, 0);
smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RME_IRQ;
return 0;
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -1282,6 +1282,7 @@
const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
int arm_vsmmu_cache_invalidate(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
struct iommu_user_data_array *array);
+bool arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu);
int arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
#else
modified include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
@@ -1068,7 +1068,6 @@
* VMM must wire the HYP_OWN bit to 0 in guest VINTF_CONFIG register
*/
IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_TEGRA241_CMDQV = 2,
- IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3 = 3,
};
/**
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list