[PATCH 1/3] arm64: errata: Reformat table for IDs
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Thu Mar 19 08:50:25 PDT 2026
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 03:32:22PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2026-03-19 2:51 pm, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 06:10:20PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > We have some inconsistency where multiple errata for the same component
> > > share the same Kconfig workaround; some are one ID per line, some are
> > > smooshed together, and some are entirely separate entries. Standardise
> > > on the single entry, one ID per line format so that things render nice
> > > and consistently in the HTML docs, and it's simple and clear to add new
> > > IDs to existing workarounds without churning the table too much.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 44 ++++++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > I think we're better off doing this at -rc1 in the Arm tree, so we avoid
> > unnecessary cross-tree conflicts for something that doesn't really matter
> > that much in the grand scheme of things.
> >
> > For now, please can you send the SMMU patch on its own so that I can
> > pick it up?
>
> Yeah, that's fair enough, it's not like it's a real dependency that would
> justify taking the SMMU patch through arm64 either. v2 sent, and if I
> haven't forgotten all about this by -rc1, I'll rebase and re-send this one
> then.
Thank you!
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list