[PATCH 1/3] arm64: errata: Reformat table for IDs

Robin Murphy robin.murphy at arm.com
Thu Mar 19 08:32:22 PDT 2026


On 2026-03-19 2:51 pm, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 06:10:20PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> We have some inconsistency where multiple errata for the same component
>> share the same Kconfig workaround; some are one ID per line, some are
>> smooshed together, and some are entirely separate entries. Standardise
>> on the single entry, one ID per line format so that things render nice
>> and consistently in the HTML docs, and it's simple and clear to add new
>> IDs to existing workarounds without churning the table too much.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 44 ++++++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> I think we're better off doing this at -rc1 in the Arm tree, so we avoid
> unnecessary cross-tree conflicts for something that doesn't really matter
> that much in the grand scheme of things.
> 
> For now, please can you send the SMMU patch on its own so that I can
> pick it up?

Yeah, that's fair enough, it's not like it's a real dependency that 
would justify taking the SMMU patch through arm64 either. v2 sent, and 
if I haven't forgotten all about this by -rc1, I'll rebase and re-send 
this one then.

(And I did rather expect that patch #3 might end up getting dropped, 
hence keeping it separate at the end. Oh well, worth a try.)

Cheers,
Robin.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list