[PATCH 00/17] KVM: arm64: More user_mem_abort() rework

[Fuad Tabba]

On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 at 17:50, Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > > The series in hack/user_mem_abort-rework is different from this one.
> > > > Here are the first few patches:
> > >
> > > And I just realized it's because they're based on _my_ patches ... doh! :D
> >
> > I thought I was clear when I wrote "I've added my on take on top of
> > it", but maybe not. In any case, I didn't feel the need to redo what
> > you had already done -- I don't think I'd have come up with something
> > better.
>
> You were clear. It's the reader's fault, not the author's.
>
> I'll send you one more patch that might be worth adding, but this
> looks great! Much easier to reason about. Thanks.

On a second thought, let's stop here. I was thinking of going ahead
with guest_memfd abort, but let's see how this one goes and take it
from there.

Thanks again for this!
/fuad

> For the series:
> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
>
> (might as well repeat it here)
> Reviwed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
>
> Cheers,
> /fuad
>
>
> >
> > In any case, I'd appreciate your feedback!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >         M.
> >
> > --
> > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.