[PATCH 00/17] KVM: arm64: More user_mem_abort() rework

[Fuad Tabba]

<snip>

> > > The series in hack/user_mem_abort-rework is different from this one.
> > > Here are the first few patches:
> >
> > And I just realized it's because they're based on _my_ patches ... doh! :D
>
> I thought I was clear when I wrote "I've added my on take on top of
> it", but maybe not. In any case, I didn't feel the need to redo what
> you had already done -- I don't think I'd have come up with something
> better.

You were clear. It's the reader's fault, not the author's.

I'll send you one more patch that might be worth adding, but this
looks great! Much easier to reason about. Thanks.

For the series:
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>

(might as well repeat it here)
Reviwed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>

Cheers,
/fuad


>
> In any case, I'd appreciate your feedback!
>
> Thanks,
>
>         M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.