[PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Spelling s/mulit/multi/, s/currenly/currently/

[Sudeep Holla]

On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 10:53:27AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
> 
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 10:38, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 09:29:29AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 09:16:29AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > BTW, I noticed some of your commits use the non-standard
> > > > "Message-Id:"-tag, while others use the standard "Link:"-tag (albeit
> > > > with the lore.kernel.org instead of the recommended patch.msgid.link
> > > > domain) to record the origin of patches.  Do you have different git
> > > > setups on different machines?
> > >
> > > Not really. I used to use "Link:" and switched to "Message-Id" a while ago.
> > > I use only one setup and if you are observing something like above, I am
> > > doing something different. I need to check what is that, but the intention
> > > is to use "Message-Id". Let me have a look.
> >
> > OK, did a quick check and see last time I used "Link:" was an year ago and
> > that's when I saw some discussions about use of "Link:" for other purposes and
> > switched to "Message-Id". Let me know if I am messing up something still,
> > happy to look into it and fix it up.
> 
> There was indeed a fuzz about the Link:-tag[1].  In the end,
> it was agreed that the Link:-tags are fine, but please use the
> patch.msgid.link domain, to distinguish it from discussions (which
> should use lore.kernel.org).  Unfortunately I can't find a link to that
> (too many trees in the Google forest).
> 

Ah OK, I didn't follow up to the conclusion of that discussion for sure.

> About Message-Id: I totally agree with [2] ;-)
> 

Thanks, at least the setup is working as expected though it is not using
more common "Link:" format.

> Thanks!
> 
> [1] "A policy for Link tags"
>     https://lwn.net/Articles/1037069/
> 
> [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/1038003/
> 

Thanks for the pointers. Much appreciated! I will use "Message-Id" for this
(v7.1 cycle) and switch to Link as per the above format later as I see that
is more common than "Message-Id" in v7.0 cycle. I don't want to fix-up now 😄.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep