[PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Spelling s/mulit/multi/, s/currenly/currently/

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Sudeep,

On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 10:38, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 09:29:29AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 09:16:29AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > BTW, I noticed some of your commits use the non-standard
> > > "Message-Id:"-tag, while others use the standard "Link:"-tag (albeit
> > > with the lore.kernel.org instead of the recommended patch.msgid.link
> > > domain) to record the origin of patches.  Do you have different git
> > > setups on different machines?
> >
> > Not really. I used to use "Link:" and switched to "Message-Id" a while ago.
> > I use only one setup and if you are observing something like above, I am
> > doing something different. I need to check what is that, but the intention
> > is to use "Message-Id". Let me have a look.
>
> OK, did a quick check and see last time I used "Link:" was an year ago and
> that's when I saw some discussions about use of "Link:" for other purposes and
> switched to "Message-Id". Let me know if I am messing up something still,
> happy to look into it and fix it up.

There was indeed a fuzz about the Link:-tag[1].  In the end,
it was agreed that the Link:-tags are fine, but please use the
patch.msgid.link domain, to distinguish it from discussions (which
should use lore.kernel.org).  Unfortunately I can't find a link to that
(too many trees in the Google forest).

About Message-Id: I totally agree with [2] ;-)

Thanks!

[1] "A policy for Link tags"
    https://lwn.net/Articles/1037069/

[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/1038003/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds