[GIT PULL] Allwinner DT Changes for 7.2

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 8:51 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2026 13:48, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 8:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 03:09:52AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >>> The following changes since commit 254f49634ee16a731174d2ae34bc50bd5f45e731:
> >>>
> >>>   Linux 7.1-rc1 (2026-04-26 14:19:00 -0700)
> >>>
> >>> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>>
> >>>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sunxi/linux.git tags/sunxi-dt-for-7.2
> >>>
> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 44cf19e41c769720750dbb8752aca75c247e565f:
> >>>
> >>>   arm64: dts: allwinner: a523: add gpadc node (2026-05-25 05:02:58 +0800)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As mentioned in the tag, this pull request contains a change that should
> >>> be shared between the soc and clk trees. However since I don't have any
> >>> clk changes to send this cycle, I think it can just go through the soc
> >>> tree without any issues.
> >>
> >> But the clock driver change cannot be in the DTS branch. This should go
> >> via clock tree even if it is one change. And definitely not via DTS
> >> branch.
> >
> > It is a shared change, because it moves two symbols from the driver's
> > private header to the public DT binding header. I don't see how this
> > can go through just the clk tree when one of the subsequent patches
> > uses those new symbols.
> >
> > "clk: sunxi-ng: v3s: Export MBUS and DRAM clocks to the public header"
> > is needed by "ARM: dts: sun8i: v3s: Add mbus node to represent the
> > interconnect".
> >
> > The other way to go about this is to use raw numbers first, then
> > another patch in the next cycle to switch the numbers to actual
> > macros. IMHO not worth the churn and headache.
>
> You can have a duplicated define.

I honestly did not know that it worked.

However, splitting what is effectively one logical change (*move*
something) into two patches just to be able to merge them through two
separate trees still seems wrong to me.

Would it help if Stephen gave an ack?


ChenYu