[GIT PULL] Allwinner DT Changes for 7.2
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Tue Jun 9 04:51:28 PDT 2026
On 09/06/2026 13:48, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 8:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 03:09:52AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit 254f49634ee16a731174d2ae34bc50bd5f45e731:
>>>
>>> Linux 7.1-rc1 (2026-04-26 14:19:00 -0700)
>>>
>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sunxi/linux.git tags/sunxi-dt-for-7.2
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 44cf19e41c769720750dbb8752aca75c247e565f:
>>>
>>> arm64: dts: allwinner: a523: add gpadc node (2026-05-25 05:02:58 +0800)
>>>
>>>
>>> As mentioned in the tag, this pull request contains a change that should
>>> be shared between the soc and clk trees. However since I don't have any
>>> clk changes to send this cycle, I think it can just go through the soc
>>> tree without any issues.
>>
>> But the clock driver change cannot be in the DTS branch. This should go
>> via clock tree even if it is one change. And definitely not via DTS
>> branch.
>
> It is a shared change, because it moves two symbols from the driver's
> private header to the public DT binding header. I don't see how this
> can go through just the clk tree when one of the subsequent patches
> uses those new symbols.
>
> "clk: sunxi-ng: v3s: Export MBUS and DRAM clocks to the public header"
> is needed by "ARM: dts: sun8i: v3s: Add mbus node to represent the
> interconnect".
>
> The other way to go about this is to use raw numbers first, then
> another patch in the next cycle to switch the numbers to actual
> macros. IMHO not worth the churn and headache.
You can have a duplicated define.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list