[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Advertise ID_AA64PFR2_EL1.GCIE

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 10:07:51PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Gah. No idea how I managed to miss that: the register fields must be
> strictly ordered, and I placed the field in the wrong spot. The
> following hack fixes it for me:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 5bca6e064ca72..1bfaa96881dab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr1[] = {
>  
>  static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr2[] = {
>  	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_FPMR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE_NI),
>  	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTEFAR_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTEFAR_NI),
>  	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTESTOREONLY_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTESTOREONLY_NI),
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE_NI),
>  	ARM64_FTR_END,
>  };
>  
> If that works for you, I'll fold that into the original patch...

Can confirm.

> Thanks for pointing this out!

Thanks for the quick fix!

Cheers,
Nathan