[PATCH RFC 0/9] gpio: improve support for shared GPIOs

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:42:11PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 4:08 PM Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:

> > I'm not sure I see the need for deferred notifications?  We'd need to go
> > round all the users whenever a physical change to the GPIO happens but
> > it's not clear what we'd need to store beyond the list of users?

> In my mind I was thinking that we only need to send the notifications
> to users who already enabled/disabled the regulator too but you're
> right, it seems like a loop over the relevant pins should be enough.

Ah, great - yeah, I'd expect notifications either way just to be on the
safe side.

> In any case: this is outside the scope of this series but I'll see if
> it's easy enough to add separately.

Yes, definitely outside the scope of the series.  If you do something
that'd be great but no pressure.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20251021/0134013c/attachment.sig>