[PATCH RESEND v4 1/3] dt-bindings: lcdif: Document a imx6sx-lcdif fallback

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Ahmad,

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:53 PM Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2025, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Liu,
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 1:12 AM Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Strictly speaking, I don't think i.MX6SX LCDIF is compatible with i.MX28 LCDIF
> >> because at least i.MX28 LCDIF has the version and debug{0,1,2} registers(at
> >> 0x1c0, 0x1d0, 0x1e0 and 0x1f0) while i.MX6SX LCDIF hasn't.
> >
> > There are some DT users, such as Barebox that matches against
> > fsl,imx28-lcdif, so we cannot remove it.
>
> Hmmm, it looks like software projects like Barebox don't really follow this DT
> binding.  Is it possible to fix Barebox to avoid changing this DT binding by
> this patch?  I'm assuming that Uboot has already been fixed.

What do you think?

Thanks