[PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/03/2025 04:40, Swathi K S wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>> Sent: 05 March 2025 21:12
>> To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks at samsung.com>; krzk+dt at kernel.org;
>> andrew+netdev at lunn.ch; davem at davemloft.net; edumazet at google.com;
>> kuba at kernel.org; pabeni at redhat.com; robh at kernel.org;
>> conor+dt at kernel.org; richardcochran at gmail.com;
>> mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com; alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com
>> Cc: rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk; netdev at vger.kernel.org;
>> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com;
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
>> pankaj.dubey at samsung.com; ravi.patel at samsung.com;
>> gost.dev at samsung.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree
>> bindings
>>
>> On 05/03/2025 10:12, Swathi K S wrote:
>>> Add FSD Ethernet compatible in Synopsys dt-bindings document. Add FSD
>>> Ethernet YAML schema to enable the DT validation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel at samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Swathi K S <swathi.ks at samsung.com>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch
>> changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
>> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list.
>> Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches
>> *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags
>> received on the version they apply.
>>
>> Please read:
>> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=19972162-781c345b-1996aa2d-
>> 000babffae10-7bd6b1a1d78b210b&q=1&e=94dcc3a6-5303-441a-8c1e-
>> de696b216f86&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.12-
>> rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-
>> patches.rst%23L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
> Hi Krzysztof, 
> As per a review comment received from Russell, I had added 2 new properties to the DT - assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-parents properties. 
> The example in the DT binding reflects the same.
> I felt it wouldn't be fair to add 'Reviewed-by' tag without you reviewing the updates again.
> But I should have mentioned that in cover letter and apologies for missing to do that.
Nothing in changelog explained new properties. Nothing mentioned
dropping tag, which you always must explicitly say.

Best regards,
Krzysztof