[PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree bindings

[Swathi K S]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> Sent: 05 March 2025 21:12
> To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks at samsung.com>; krzk+dt at kernel.org;
> andrew+netdev at lunn.ch; davem at davemloft.net; edumazet at google.com;
> kuba at kernel.org; pabeni at redhat.com; robh at kernel.org;
> conor+dt at kernel.org; richardcochran at gmail.com;
> mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com; alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com
> Cc: rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk; netdev at vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> pankaj.dubey at samsung.com; ravi.patel at samsung.com;
> gost.dev at samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree
> bindings
> 
> On 05/03/2025 10:12, Swathi K S wrote:
> > Add FSD Ethernet compatible in Synopsys dt-bindings document. Add FSD
> > Ethernet YAML schema to enable the DT validation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Swathi K S <swathi.ks at samsung.com>
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch
> changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list.
> Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches
> *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags
> received on the version they apply.
> 
> Please read:
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=19972162-781c345b-1996aa2d-
> 000babffae10-7bd6b1a1d78b210b&q=1&e=94dcc3a6-5303-441a-8c1e-
> de696b216f86&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.12-
> rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-
> patches.rst%23L577
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Hi Krzysztof, 
As per a review comment received from Russell, I had added 2 new properties to the DT - assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-parents properties. 
The example in the DT binding reflects the same.
I felt it wouldn't be fair to add 'Reviewed-by' tag without you reviewing the updates again.
But I should have mentioned that in cover letter and apologies for missing to do that.

- Swathi

> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof