[PATCH 10/12] dt-bindings: samsung,mipi-dsim: document exynos7870 DSIM compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 18/06/2025 16:27, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
> On 2025-06-18 10:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/06/2025 17:18, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
>>> Add compatible string for Exynos7870 DSIM bridge controller. The
>>> devicetree node requires four clock sources, named:
>>> - bus_clk
>>> - phyclk_mipidphy0_bitclkdiv8
>>> - phyclk_mipidphy0_rxclkesc0
>>> - sclk_mipi
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss at disroot.org>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/display/bridge/samsung,mipi-dsim.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/samsung,mipi-dsim.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/samsung,mipi-dsim.yaml
>>> index 1acad99f396527192b6853f0096cfb8ae5669e6b..887f3ba1edd24a177a766b1b523d0c197ff1123a 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/samsung,mipi-dsim.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/samsung,mipi-dsim.yaml
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
>>>            - samsung,exynos5410-mipi-dsi
>>>            - samsung,exynos5422-mipi-dsi
>>>            - samsung,exynos5433-mipi-dsi
>>> +          - samsung,exynos7870-mipi-dsi
>>>            - fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim
>>>            - fsl,imx8mp-mipi-dsim
>>>        - items:
>>> @@ -144,6 +145,31 @@ required:
>>>  
>>>  allOf:
>>>    - $ref: ../dsi-controller.yaml#
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          contains:
>>> +            const: samsung,exynos7870-mipi-dsi
>>> +
>>> +    then:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        clocks:
>>> +          minItems: 4
>>
>> maxItems: 4
> 
> Will replace. maxItems == minItems implicit if maxItems present and
> minItems absent.

No, you need both. Add maxItemsd. Look at all or most of Exynos bindings.

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +        clock-names:
>>> +          items:
>>> +            - const: bus_clk
>>> +            - const: phyclk_mipidphy0_bitclkdiv8
>>> +            - const: phyclk_mipidphy0_rxclkesc0
>>> +            - const: sclk_mipi
>>
>> Does any existing driver code actually depends on the names? If not, we
>> switched in Samsung in general to names matching the input or the
>> function, not the name of provider. bus, bit (or bitdiv?), rx or esc0, sclk 
> 
> Yeah, Exynos5433 uses it. Code is here [1].

It is fine then.

> 
> Though, I could get around this if you would like to. Would need to add
> a few more patches.

If you want to work on this, then it would be useful - add clock names
per variant/device and just clk_get_bulk() on supplied array. Up to you.


Best regards,
Krzysztof