[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for Variscite VAR-SOM-AM62P

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Thu Jul 10 07:42:16 PDT 2025


On 10/07/2025 15:53, Stefano Radaelli wrote:
>> Then why do you define it reversed here? How this som-factor-processor
>> is an argument to my request to use som-factor-processor?
> 
> I apologize for the confusion in my previous email. I made an error in
> my explanation - our compatible strings actually follow the format
> "processor"-"som-factor", not "som-factor"-"processor" as I
> incorrectly stated. That's why our compatible string is
> "variscite,am62p-var-som" (processor-som-factor), consistent with the
> examples I provided of Variscite kernel like
> "variscite,imx93-var-som", "variscite,imx8mp-var-som", and
> "variscite,imx91-var-som".

There are no such compatibles. There are:

variscite,var-som-mx93
variscite,var-som-mx8mn

and others with exact format how I asked - var-som-<processor>.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list