[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for Variscite VAR-SOM-AM62P

[Stefano Radaelli]

> Then why do you define it reversed here? How this som-factor-processor
> is an argument to my request to use som-factor-processor?

I apologize for the confusion in my previous email. I made an error in
my explanation - our compatible strings actually follow the format
"processor"-"som-factor", not "som-factor"-"processor" as I
incorrectly stated. That's why our compatible string is
"variscite,am62p-var-som" (processor-som-factor), consistent with the
examples I provided of Variscite kernel like
"variscite,imx93-var-som", "variscite,imx8mp-var-som", and
"variscite,imx91-var-som".

>
> I asked to reply with mailing list style already. Why are you still
> top-posting? It makes the discussion difficult.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
>

I apologize for the top-posting. I didn't realize I was doing it and
will ensure to follow proper mailing list etiquette going forward.

Best Regards,
Stefano