[PATCH 2/5] arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API
Jonathan Cameron
Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com
Tue Jul 8 01:31:49 PDT 2025
On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 16:04:11 +0100
Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee at huawei.com> wrote:
> Cleans up the cpu-map generation using the created API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 3ebe77566788..88970f13f684 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -518,23 +518,23 @@ core_initcall(free_raw_capacity);
> */
> static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
> {
> + struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) = NULL;
> int cpu;
> - struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) =
> - of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
>
> - if (!cpu_node)
> - return -1;
> + cpu = of_cpu_phandle_to_id(node, &cpu_node, 0);
>
> - cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(cpu_node);
Better I think to flip logic to exit early on errors.
So taking previous review into account - something like.
struct device_node *cpu_node = NULL;
int cpu;
cpu = of_cpu_phandle_to_id(node, &cpu_node, 0);
if (cpu == -ENODEV) {
pr_info("CPU node for %pOF exist but the possible cpu range is :%*pbl\n",
cpu_node, cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));
return -ENODEV;
} else if (cpu < 0) {
return cpu;
}
topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cpu_node, cpu);
of_node_put(cpu_node);
return cpu;
> if (cpu >= 0)
> topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cpu_node, cpu);
> - else
> + else if (cpu == -ENODEV)
> pr_info("CPU node for %pOF exist but the possible cpu range is :%*pbl\n",
> cpu_node, cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));
> + else
> + return -1;
>
> return cpu;
> }
>
> +
Check all patches before posting for noise like this. It sneaks in as
rebases / refactors happen so you always need to eyeball for it at the end
of development.
> static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int package_id,
> int cluster_id, int core_id)
> {
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list