[PATCH 2/5] arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Tue Jul 8 01:26:21 PDT 2025
On 08/07/2025 10:22, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:29:43 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On 07/07/2025 17:04, Alireza Sanaee wrote:
>>> Cleans up the cpu-map generation using the created API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee at huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
>>> index 3ebe77566788..88970f13f684 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
>>> @@ -518,23 +518,23 @@ core_initcall(free_raw_capacity);
>>> */
>>> static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
>>> {
>>> + struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) = NULL;
>>
>>
>> That's not a correct style anymore. What's more it is not really
>> explained anywhere. Follow standard cleanup.h rules (constructor).
>
> There isn't a good solution in this case as the constructor is via
> a pointer passed as an argument. I'd just fall back to not using
That's even more confusing! There is a destructor here but no
constructor. This is clearly the pattern we people wanted to avoid with
cleanup.h.
> __free here and instead doing a manual put of the node in the
> paths where it is set. That might just be the final successful
Yes.
> return path - I've not checked closely.
Just noticed now:
Patch btw has some more unrelated white space changes... :/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list