[PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] net: stmmac: simplify phylink_suspend() and phylink_resume() calls

[Russell King (Oracle)]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 05:45:35PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > @@ -7927,13 +7925,9 @@ int stmmac_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	rtnl_lock();
> > -	if (device_may_wakeup(priv->device) && priv->plat->pmt) {
> > -		phylink_resume(priv->phylink);
> > -	} else {
> > -		phylink_resume(priv->phylink);
> > -		if (device_may_wakeup(priv->device))
> > -			phylink_speed_up(priv->phylink);
> > -	}
> > +	phylink_resume(priv->phylink);
> > +	if (device_may_wakeup(priv->device) && !priv->plat->pmt)
> > +		phylink_speed_up(priv->phylink);
> >  	rtnl_unlock();
> >  
> >  	rtnl_lock();
> 
> Unrelated to this patch, but unlock() followed by lock()? Seems like
> some more code which could be cleaned up?

Indeed, this vanishes in the next patch due to phylink_resume()
moving later.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!