[PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] net: stmmac: simplify phylink_suspend() and phylink_resume() calls

[Andrew Lunn]

> @@ -7927,13 +7925,9 @@ int stmmac_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	rtnl_lock();
> -	if (device_may_wakeup(priv->device) && priv->plat->pmt) {
> -		phylink_resume(priv->phylink);
> -	} else {
> -		phylink_resume(priv->phylink);
> -		if (device_may_wakeup(priv->device))
> -			phylink_speed_up(priv->phylink);
> -	}
> +	phylink_resume(priv->phylink);
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(priv->device) && !priv->plat->pmt)
> +		phylink_speed_up(priv->phylink);
>  	rtnl_unlock();
>  
>  	rtnl_lock();

Unrelated to this patch, but unlock() followed by lock()? Seems like
some more code which could be cleaned up?

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>

    Andrew