[EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable HSR driver

[Malladi, Meghana]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 2/26/2025 4:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/02/2025 11: 44, Malladi, Meghana wrote: > > > On 2/26/2025 1: 35 
> PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 26/02/2025 07: 18, Malladi, Meghana 
> wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies in >> case you are receiving this email
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source 
> of this email and know the content is safe.
> Report Suspicious
> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK! 
> updq3RaPV007wGXFFrPD30z5a3GGYjpJweyhUcIfUTTaUs-8q0QpC4Yk9azBiFp7cBAf2Knk6fnVs4Fs-zRjTMEn8kmpiGo$>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> 
> On 26/02/2025 11:44, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/26/2025 1:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 26/02/2025 07: 18, Malladi, Meghana wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies in 
>>> case you are receiving this email for the second time. > Any reason why 
>>> this patch hasn't been merged yet. Other than re-basing > this to the 
>>> tip, anything
>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>>> This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source 
>>> of this email and know the content is safe.
>>> Report Suspicious
>>> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK! 
>>> updgnZav1ue7gKXOnHOpH5hg8gLmw9Osqsqh- 
>>> KTLRTnBEurV_VetrG7mzU898vB_5xFrYgbRkkuuFMBobM-uhFAmUgccRSk$>
>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>>>
>>> On 26/02/2025 07:18, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Apologies in case you are receiving this email for the second time.
> 
> BTW, Arnd when responded with Ack described the process.
> 

Yes, I wanted to re-confirm before posting it again (just in case).

>>>> Any reason why this patch hasn't been merged yet. Other than re-basing 
>>>> this to the tip, anything else which needs to be addressed to get this 
>>>> merged?
>>>
>>> I don't think you sent it to your platform maintainers, so no one would
>>> apply it. Usually people ignore emails they did not receive, although I
>>> am here an exception tracking missing-DT-patchwork things... :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>> 
>> Hello Arnd/Krzysztof,
>> 
>> Thank you for the replies :)
>> Was having ambiguity since this is not TI specific change. Wanted to 
>> confirm before re-posting. Will post v2 patch including TI platform 
>> maintainers.
> 
> It is not TI specific? Then which upstream boards benefit from this if
> not TI?
> 

This change enables generic HSR protocol support in the kernel which is 
required for HSR driver support in TI boards. When I said "not TI 
specific" - I meant this change is not internal to TI driver. Hope this 
clarifies the miscommunication from my earlier mail.

Best Regards,
Meghana

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>