[EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable HSR driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 26/02/2025 11:44, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/26/2025 1:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/02/2025 07: 18, Malladi, Meghana wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies in 
>> case you are receiving this email for the second time. > Any reason why 
>> this patch hasn't been merged yet. Other than re-basing > this to the 
>> tip, anything
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>> This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source 
>> of this email and know the content is safe.
>> Report Suspicious
>> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK! 
>> updgnZav1ue7gKXOnHOpH5hg8gLmw9Osqsqh- 
>> KTLRTnBEurV_VetrG7mzU898vB_5xFrYgbRkkuuFMBobM-uhFAmUgccRSk$>
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>>
>> On 26/02/2025 07:18, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Apologies in case you are receiving this email for the second time.

BTW, Arnd when responded with Ack described the process.

>>> Any reason why this patch hasn't been merged yet. Other than re-basing 
>>> this to the tip, anything else which needs to be addressed to get this 
>>> merged?
>>
>> I don't think you sent it to your platform maintainers, so no one would
>> apply it. Usually people ignore emails they did not receive, although I
>> am here an exception tracking missing-DT-patchwork things... :)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Hello Arnd/Krzysztof,
> 
> Thank you for the replies :)
> Was having ambiguity since this is not TI specific change. Wanted to 
> confirm before re-posting. Will post v2 patch including TI platform 
> maintainers.

It is not TI specific? Then which upstream boards benefit from this if
not TI?



Best regards,
Krzysztof