[PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix hash_name() and branch predictor issues
Xie Yuanbin
xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com
Wed Dec 10 01:08:36 PST 2025
Hi, Russell!
The syzkaller test has been running for 19+ hours now, and no issues
have been found so far. So to patch3:
Tested-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com>
This test will continue to run. If any issues are found, I will email
you. If I don't send any emails, then there are no issues. :)
On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 16:56:27 +0800, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> patch1 and patch2 with compilation error fixed:
>
> Tested-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com>
>
> patch3:
> The simple test case passed, but the syzkaller test (the original
> scenario that triggered the branch predictor issue) is still running.
> The syzkaller test is better to run for a day.
>
> ...
>
> 2. About the branch predictor issue:
> Simple test cases (Link same as above) that can trigger this issue, has
> passed the tests. However, the original scenario which trigger the issue
> is the syzkaller test, which might take some time, possibly around a day.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list