[PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix hash_name() and branch predictor issues

Xie Yuanbin xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com
Tue Dec 9 01:09:38 PST 2025


On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 08:59:24 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 04:56:27PM +0800, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
>> Hi, Russell!
>>
>> TL; DR:
>> patch1 and patch2 with compilation error fixed:
>>
>> Tested-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com>
>>
>> patch3:
>> The simple test case passed, but the syzkaller test (the original
>> scenario that triggered the branch predictor issue) is still running.
>> The syzkaller test is better to run for a day.
>>
>> All patches with compilation error fixed:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com>
>
> To avoid any confusion, does this include my preferred fix that I sent
> or your change?
>
> Thanks.

I am using my change, which is detailed in the last email, because you
send your preferred fix just 10 mins ago.

Also, I do the test with Liyuan's patch as "suffix" patch, as mentioned
in the previous email.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list