[PATCH rc v3 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage
Nicolin Chen
nicolinc at nvidia.com
Tue Dec 9 18:45:19 PST 2025
STE in a nested case requires both S1 and S2 fields. And this makes the use
case different from the existing one.
Add coverage for previously failed cases shifting between S2-only and S1+S2
STEs.
Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai at linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc at nvidia.com>
---
.../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
index 3556e65cf9ac..ffa43e103692 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
@@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ static struct mm_struct sva_mm = {
enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat {
ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS = BIT(0),
ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL = BIT(1),
+ ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED = BIT(2),
};
+static void arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste,
+ enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat);
+
static bool arm_smmu_entry_differs_in_used_bits(const __le64 *entry,
const __le64 *used_bits,
const __le64 *target,
@@ -198,6 +202,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste,
};
arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss);
+ if (feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED) {
+ struct arm_smmu_ste s2ste;
+ int i;
+
+ arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
+ ste->data[0] |= cpu_to_le64(
+ FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_NESTED));
+ ste->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
+ for (i = 2; i < NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS; i++)
+ ste->data[i] = s2ste.data[i];
+ }
}
static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_bypass_to_abort(struct kunit *test)
@@ -555,6 +570,35 @@ static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_s1_stall(struct kunit *test)
NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3));
}
+static void
+arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1dssbypass_to_s1bypass(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste;
+ struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste;
+
+ arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(
+ &s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
+ ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED);
+ arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0);
+ /* Expect an additional sync to unset ignored bits: EATS and MEV */
+ arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s1_ste, &s2_ste,
+ NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3));
+}
+
+static void
+arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1bypass_to_s1dssbypass(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste;
+ struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste;
+
+ arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(
+ &s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
+ ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED);
+ arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0);
+ arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s2_ste, &s1_ste,
+ NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(2));
+}
+
static void arm_smmu_v3_write_cd_test_sva_clear(struct kunit *test)
{
struct arm_smmu_cd cd = {};
@@ -601,6 +645,8 @@ static struct kunit_case arm_smmu_v3_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(arm_smmu_v3_write_cd_test_s1_change_asid),
KUNIT_CASE(arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s1_to_s2_stall),
KUNIT_CASE(arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_s1_stall),
+ KUNIT_CASE(arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1dssbypass_to_s1bypass),
+ KUNIT_CASE(arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1bypass_to_s1dssbypass),
KUNIT_CASE(arm_smmu_v3_write_cd_test_sva_clear),
KUNIT_CASE(arm_smmu_v3_write_cd_test_sva_release),
{},
--
2.43.0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list