[PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: Provide basic EL2 setup for FEAT_{LS64, LS64_V} usage at EL0/1

Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose at arm.com
Thu Apr 3 02:04:46 PDT 2025


On 31/03/2025 10:43, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong at hisilicon.com>
> 
> Instructions introduced by FEAT_{LS64, LS64_V} is controlled by
> HCRX_EL2.{EnALS, EnASR}. Configure all of these to allow usage
> at EL0/1.
> 
> This doesn't mean these instructions are always available in
> EL0/1 if provided. The hypervisor still have the control at
> runtime.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong at hisilicon.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 12 +++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> index ebceaae3c749..0259941602c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> @@ -57,9 +57,19 @@
>           /* Enable GCS if supported */
>   	mrs_s	x1, SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
>   	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_GCS_SHIFT, #4
> -	cbz	x1, .Lset_hcrx_\@
> +	cbz	x1, .Lskip_gcs_hcrx_\@
>   	orr	x0, x0, #HCRX_EL2_GCSEn
>   
> +.Lskip_gcs_hcrx_\@:

minor nit: For consistency, could we rename this "set_ls64", similar to 
"set_hcrx" ?

> +	/* Enable LS64, LS64_V if supported */
> +	mrs_s	x1, SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1
> +	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1_LS64_SHIFT, #4
> +	cbz	x1, .Lset_hcrx_\@
> +	orr	x0, x0, #HCRX_EL2_EnALS
> +	cmp	x1, #ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1_LS64_LS64_V
> +	b.lt	.Lset_hcrx_\@
> +	orr	x0, x0, #HCRX_EL2_EnASR
> +
>   .Lset_hcrx_\@:
>   	msr_s	SYS_HCRX_EL2, x0
>   .Lskip_hcrx_\@:

Suzuki



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list