[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add compatible string for CPM5 controller-1.

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/09/2024 12:43, Havalige, Thippeswamy wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2024 3:26 PM
>> To: Havalige, Thippeswamy <thippeswamy.havalige at amd.com>;
>> manivannan.sadhasivam at linaro.org; robh at kernel.org; linux-
>> pci at vger.kernel.org; bhelgaas at google.com; linux-arm-
>> kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
>> krzk+dt at kernel.org; conor+dt at kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Gogada, Bharat Kumar <bharat.kumar.gogada at amd.com>; Simek,
>> Michal <michal.simek at amd.com>; lpieralisi at kernel.org; kw at linux.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add compatible string
>> for CPM5 controller-1.
>>
>> On 06/09/2024 11:31, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
>>> The Xilinx Versal premium series has CPM5 block which supports two
>>> typeA Root Port controller functionality at Gen5 speed.
>>>
>>> Add compatible string to distinguish between two CPM5 rootport
>> controller1.
>>
>> Subjects NEVER end with full stops.
> Thanks, Update in the next patch series.
>>>
>>> Error interrupt register and bits for both the controllers are at
>>> different.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thippeswamy Havalige <thippesw at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml
>>> index 989fb0fa2577..b63a759ec2d7 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
>>>      enum:
>>>        - xlnx,versal-cpm-host-1.00
>>>        - xlnx,versal-cpm5-host
>>> +      - xlnx,versal-cpm5-host1
>>
>> That's poor naming. "-1.00" and now "1". Get your naming reasonable...
> Here 1.00 represents the IP versioning and host1 represents controller-1. 

I understand but you repeating the same is not helping. Make it better
and next time upstream "host1-1" compatible.

Number of ports, BTW, comes from ports, right? So no need for the
compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof