[PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable card detect wake for S32G based platforms
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Thu Jul 11 08:55:31 PDT 2024
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 16:26, Ciprian Marian Costea
<ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/10/2024 3:34 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > On 8/07/24 15:10, Ciprian Costea wrote:
> >> In case of S32G based platforms, GPIO CD used for card detect
> >> wake mechanism is not available.
> >>
> >> For this scenario the newly introduced flag
> >> 'ESDHC_FLAG_SKIP_CD_WAKE' is used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com>
> >
> > Should have:
> >
> > - put the patch set version number (v2) in the subject e.g.
> > [PATCH v2 1/3] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable card detect wake for S32G based platforms
> >
> > - added Haibo Chen's Reviewed-by tag
> >
> > Anyway:
> >
> > Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter at intel.com>
> >
>
> Hello Adrian,
>
> Sorry for bothering you with this question, but should I send a new
> patchset adding the new version or what is the process after this step ?
> For example, should I send this patchset again with V3 adding all the
> ACKs & Reviewed-by tags to each commit from the patchset ?
No need to send a new version this time, I can add Haibo's tag when
applying. Although I prefer an ack from him for patch3 before I merge
this.
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> Best Regards,
> Ciprian
>
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 8 ++++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> >> index 40a6e2f8145a..21d984a77be8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> >> @@ -201,6 +201,9 @@
> >> /* ERR004536 is not applicable for the IP */
> >> #define ESDHC_FLAG_SKIP_ERR004536 BIT(17)
> >>
> >> +/* The IP does not have GPIO CD wake capabilities */
> >> +#define ESDHC_FLAG_SKIP_CD_WAKE BIT(18)
> >> +
> >> enum wp_types {
> >> ESDHC_WP_NONE, /* no WP, neither controller nor gpio */
> >> ESDHC_WP_CONTROLLER, /* mmc controller internal WP */
> >> @@ -298,7 +301,7 @@ static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_s32g2_data = {
> >> .flags = ESDHC_FLAG_USDHC | ESDHC_FLAG_MAN_TUNING
> >> | ESDHC_FLAG_HAVE_CAP1 | ESDHC_FLAG_HS200
> >> | ESDHC_FLAG_HS400 | ESDHC_FLAG_HS400_ES
> >> - | ESDHC_FLAG_SKIP_ERR004536,
> >> + | ESDHC_FLAG_SKIP_ERR004536 | ESDHC_FLAG_SKIP_CD_WAKE,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx7ulp_data = {
> >> @@ -1726,7 +1729,8 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR | MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR;
> >>
> >> /* GPIO CD can be set as a wakeup source */
> >> - host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_CD_WAKE;
> >> + if (!(imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_SKIP_CD_WAKE))
> >> + host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_CD_WAKE;
> >>
> >> if (!(imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_HS200))
> >> host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_HS200;
> >
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list