[PATCH 2/2] ARM: decompressor: add option to ignore MEM ATAGs

Linus Walleij linus.walleij at linaro.org
Sun Jan 21 11:37:19 PST 2024


On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 6:00 PM Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:52:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 9:14 PM Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT_IGNORE_MEM)
> > > +#define do_ignore_mem 1
> > > +#else
> > > +#define do_ignore_mem 0
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Is there a reason why you can't just use:
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT_IGNORE_MEM))
> > in the code?
> >
>
> Was following the pattern, yes I can totally do this change... Will send
> a v2 with this changed.
>
> Since the first patch has to be regression tested, is it ok to add the
> Tag in v2 or I should wait that to send v2?

Just add the tag.

Thanks,
Linus Walleij



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list