[PATCH 2/2] ARM: decompressor: add option to ignore MEM ATAGs

Christian Marangi ansuelsmth at gmail.com
Sat Jan 20 09:00:32 PST 2024


On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:52:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 9:14 PM Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT_IGNORE_MEM)
> > +#define do_ignore_mem 1
> > +#else
> > +#define do_ignore_mem 0
> > +#endif
> 
> Is there a reason why you can't just use:
> 
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT_IGNORE_MEM))
> in the code?
> 

Was following the pattern, yes I can totally do this change... Will send
a v2 with this changed.

Since the first patch has to be regression tested, is it ok to add the
Tag in v2 or I should wait that to send v2?

-- 
	Ansuel



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list