[EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] perf: imx_perf: add support for i.MX95 platform

Xu Yang xu.yang_2 at nxp.com
Thu Feb 29 02:27:03 PST 2024


Hi Will,

> 
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:58:08PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> > i.MX95 has a DDR PMU which is almostly same as i.MX93, it now supports
> > read beat and write beat filter capabilities. This will add support for
> > i.MX95 and enhance the driver to support specific filter handling for it.
> >
> > Usage:
> >
> > For read beat:
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt2,counter=3,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt1,counter=4,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt0,counter=5,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > eg: For edma2: perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt0,counter=5,axi_mask=0x00f,axi_id=0x00c/
> >
> > For write beat:
> > ~# perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_wr_beat_filt,counter=2,axi_mask=ID_MASK,axi_id=ID/
> > eg: For edma2: perf stat -a -I 1000 -e imx9_ddr0/eddrtq_pm_wr_beat_filt,counter=2,axi_mask=0x00f,axi_id=0x00c/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2 at nxp.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - put soc spefific axi filter events to drvdata according
> >    to franks suggestions.
> >  - adjust pmcfg axi_id and axi_mask config
> > Changes in v3:
> >  - no changes
> > Changes in v4:
> >  - only contain imx95 parts
> > ---
> >  drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> > index b1a58e9e1617..85aaaef7212f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> > @@ -17,9 +17,19 @@
> >  #define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN    BIT(29)
> >  #define MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK          GENMASK(17, 0)
> >
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG1_WR_BEAT_FILT_EN  BIT(31)
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN  BIT(30)
> > +
> >  #define PMCFG2                               0x04
> >  #define MX93_PMCFG2_ID                       GENMASK(17, 0)
> >
> > +#define PMCFG3                               0x08
> > +#define PMCFG4                               0x0C
> > +#define PMCFG5                               0x10
> > +#define PMCFG6                               0x14
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG_ID_MASK           GENMASK(9, 0)
> > +#define MX95_PMCFG_ID                        GENMASK(25, 16)
> > +
> >  /* Global control register affects all counters and takes priority over local control registers */
> >  #define PMGC0                0x40
> >  /* Global control register bits */
> > @@ -240,6 +250,18 @@ static struct attribute *imx93_ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> >       NULL,
> >  };
> >
> > +static struct attribute *imx95_ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> > +     /* counter2 specific events */
> > +     IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_beat_filt, 73),
> > +     /* counter3 specific events */
> > +     IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt2, 73),
> > +     /* counter4 specific events */
> > +     IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt1, 73),
> > +     /* counter5 specific events */
> > +     IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt0, 73),
> > +     NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> >  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7");
> >  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(counter, "config:8-15");
> >  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(axi_id, "config1:0-17");
> > @@ -271,8 +293,14 @@ static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
> >       .attrs = imx93_ddr_perf_events_attrs,
> >  };
> >
> > +static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx95_devtype_data = {
> > +     .identifier = "imx95",
> > +     .attrs = imx95_ddr_perf_events_attrs,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
> >       { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data },
> > +     { .compatible = "fsl,imx95-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx95_devtype_data },
> >       { /* sentinel */ }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids);
> > @@ -410,6 +438,56 @@ static void imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1
> >       writel(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void imx95_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int cfg2)
> > +{
> > +     u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg, offset = 0;
> > +     int event, counter;
> > +
> > +     event = cfg & 0x000000FF;
> > +     counter = (cfg & 0x0000FF00) >> 8;
> > +
> > +     pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> > +
> > +     if (counter == 2 && event == 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_WR_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +             offset = PMCFG3;
> > +     } else if (counter == 2 && event != 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 &= ~MX95_PMCFG1_WR_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (counter == 3 && event == 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +             offset = PMCFG4;
> > +     } else if (counter == 3 && event != 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 &= ~MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (counter == 4 && event == 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +             offset = PMCFG5;
> > +     } else if (counter == 4 && event != 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 &= ~MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (counter == 5 && event == 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 |= MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +             offset = PMCFG6;
> > +     } else if (counter == 5 && event != 73) {
> > +             pmcfg1 &= ~MX95_PMCFG1_RD_BEAT_FILT_EN;
> > +     }
> 
> I think this would be much easier to read if you rewrote it as:
> 
>         switch (counter) {
>         case 2:
>                 ...
>                 break;
>         case 3:
> 
> 
> etc.

Okay, I will improve this.

> 
> > +     writel(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> 
> writel_relaxed()? (since you're already using readl_relaxed()).

Okay.

> 
> > +
> > +     if (offset) {
> > +             pmcfg = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + offset);
> > +             pmcfg &= ~(FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID_MASK, 0x3FF) |
> > +                        FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID, 0x3FF));
> > +             pmcfg |= (FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID_MASK, cfg2) |
> > +                       FIELD_PREP(MX95_PMCFG_ID, cfg1));
> > +             writel(pmcfg, pmu->base + offset);
> 
> Similarly.

Okay.

Thanks,
Xu Yang



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list