[PATCH v1 0/2] support NUMA emulation for genertic arch
Pierre Gondois
pierre.gondois at arm.com
Wed Feb 21 07:51:57 PST 2024
On 2/21/24 07:12, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:36:00PM +0800, Rongwei Wang wrote:
>> A brief introduction
>> ====================
>>
>> The NUMA emulation can fake more node base on a single
>> node system, e.g.
>
> ...
>
>> Lastly, it seems not a good choice to realize x86 and other genertic
>> archs separately. But it can indeed avoid some architecture related
>> APIs adjustments and alleviate future maintenance.
>
> Why is it a good choice? Copying 1k lines from x86 to a new place and
> having to maintain two copies does not sound like a good choice to me.
I agree it would be better to avoid duplication and extract the common
code from the original x86 implementation. The RFC seemed to go more
in this direction.
Also NITs:
- genertic -> generic
- there is a 'ifdef CONFIG_X86' in drivers/base/numa_emulation.c,
but the file should not be used by x86 as the arch doesn't set
CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
Regards,
Pierre
>
>> The previous RFC link see [1].
>>
>> Any advice are welcome, Thanks!
>>
>> Change log
>> ==========
>>
>> RFC v1 -> v1
>> * add new CONFIG_NUMA_FAKE for genertic archs.
>> * keep x86 implementation, realize numa emulation in driver/base/ for
>> genertic arch, e.g, arm64.
>>
>> [1] RFC v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20231012024842.99703-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com/
>>
>> Rongwei Wang (2):
>> arch_numa: remove __init for early_cpu_to_node
>> numa: introduce numa emulation for genertic arch
>>
>> drivers/base/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 32 +-
>> drivers/base/numa_emulation.c | 909 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/base/numa_emulation.h | 41 ++
>> include/asm-generic/numa.h | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 992 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.h
>>
>> --
>> 2.32.0.3.gf3a3e56d6
>>
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list