[PATCH v1 0/2] support NUMA emulation for genertic arch
Mike Rapoport
rppt at kernel.org
Tue Feb 20 22:12:14 PST 2024
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:36:00PM +0800, Rongwei Wang wrote:
> A brief introduction
> ====================
>
> The NUMA emulation can fake more node base on a single
> node system, e.g.
...
> Lastly, it seems not a good choice to realize x86 and other genertic
> archs separately. But it can indeed avoid some architecture related
> APIs adjustments and alleviate future maintenance.
Why is it a good choice? Copying 1k lines from x86 to a new place and
having to maintain two copies does not sound like a good choice to me.
> The previous RFC link see [1].
>
> Any advice are welcome, Thanks!
>
> Change log
> ==========
>
> RFC v1 -> v1
> * add new CONFIG_NUMA_FAKE for genertic archs.
> * keep x86 implementation, realize numa emulation in driver/base/ for
> genertic arch, e.g, arm64.
>
> [1] RFC v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20231012024842.99703-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com/
>
> Rongwei Wang (2):
> arch_numa: remove __init for early_cpu_to_node
> numa: introduce numa emulation for genertic arch
>
> drivers/base/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 32 +-
> drivers/base/numa_emulation.c | 909 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/base/numa_emulation.h | 41 ++
> include/asm-generic/numa.h | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 992 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.h
>
> --
> 2.32.0.3.gf3a3e56d6
>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list