[PATCH v1] rtc: rtc-asm9260: Switch to use dev_err_probe()
Alexander Dahl
ada at thorsis.com
Wed Aug 28 05:35:06 PDT 2024
Hello,
Am Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 08:25:07PM +0800 schrieb Yang Ruibin:
> use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err() to simplify the error path and
> standardize the format of the error code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Ruibin <11162571 at vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> index a83b47e0d..2b7058ebb 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> @@ -268,10 +268,8 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clk!\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to prepare clk!\n");
This changes the error message from "failed to enable" to "failed to
prepare", which is not what the commit message says. However
technically clk_prepare_enable() does both, so maybe a different text
would match better?
Greets
Alex
>
> ccr = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CCR);
> /* if dev is not enabled, reset it */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list