[PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am68-sk-base-board: Add clklb pin mux for mmc1

[Neha Malcom Francis]

Hi Bhavya

On 08/08/24 13:08, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
> Hi Neha,
> 
> On 08/08/24 11:51 am, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
>> Hi Bhavya
>>
>> On 07/08/24 15:46, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>> mmc1 was not functional since pin mux for clklb was not present.
>>> Thus, add clklb pin mux to get MMC working.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a266c180b398 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am68-sk: Add support for AM68 SK 
>>> base board")
>>> Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> rebased to next-20240807
>>>
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am68-sk-base-board.dts | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am68-sk-base-board.dts 
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am68-sk-base-board.dts
>>> index 90dbe31c5b81..d5ceab79536c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am68-sk-base-board.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am68-sk-base-board.dts
>>> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ main_mmc1_pins_default: main-mmc1-default-pins {
>>>           pinctrl-single,pins = <
>>>               J721S2_IOPAD(0x104, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (P23) MMC1_CLK */
>>>               J721S2_IOPAD(0x108, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (N24) MMC1_CMD */
>>> +            J721S2_IOPAD(0x100, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (###) MMC1_CLKLB */
>>>               J721S2_IOPAD(0x0fc, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (M23) MMC1_DAT0 */
>>>               J721S2_IOPAD(0x0f8, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (P24) MMC1_DAT1 */
>>>               J721S2_IOPAD(0x0f4, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (R24) MMC1_DAT2 */
>>
>> How is this different from the P23 pinmux for MMC1_CLK? Could you explain what 
>> CLKLB is, since it doesn't have a ball number I'm finding it difficult to 
>> understand what it is?
>>
> This pin needs to be setup so that MMC_CLK is looped back at pad level for 
> highspeed SDIO operations (has been same across K3 family). MMC0/1 has this pin 
> configured as INPUT by reset default as these have boot media
> 
>   These pinmuxes are derived from pinmux file shared by EVM team during 
> wakeup/board bringup.
> 

Thank you for explaining.

Reviewed-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis at ti.com>

> Regards
> 

-- 
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis