[RFT PATCH v2 10/10] arm64: dts: microchip: sparx5_pcb135: drop duplicated NOR flash

[Steen Hegelund]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 21:04 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
> 
> Since beginning the DTS extended the SPI0 in two places adding two
> SPI
> muxes, each with same SPI NOR flash.  Both used exactly the same
> chip-selects, so this was clearly buggy code.  Then in commit
> d0f482bb06f9 ("arm64: dts: sparx5: Add the Sparx5 switch node") one
> SPI
> mux was removed, while keeping the SPI NOR flash node.
> 
> This still leaves duplicated SPI nodes under same chip select 0,
> reported by dtc W=1 warnings:
> 
>   sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi:92.10-96.4: Warning
> (unique_unit_address_if_enabled):
> /axi at 600000000/spi at 600104000/flash at 0: duplicate unit-address (also
> used in node /axi at 600000000/spi at 600104000/spi at 0)
> 
> Steen Hegelund confirmed that in fact there is a SPI mux, thus remove
> the duplicated node without the mux.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Not tested on hardware
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Remove SPI node without mux.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> index 20016efb3656..af2f1831f07f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> @@ -87,15 +87,6 @@ i2cmux_s32: i2cmux-3-pins {
>         };
>  };
> 
> -&spi0 {
> -       status = "okay";
> -       flash at 0 {
> -               compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> -               spi-max-frequency = <8000000>;
> -               reg = <0>;
> -       };
> -};
> -
>  &spi0 {
>         status = "okay";
>         spi at 0 {
> --
> 2.34.1
> 

This also works fine on my setup now.
Thanks for the patch series.

For this patch:
Tested-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund at microchip.com>


BR
Steen