[PATCH 1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add ports subnodes in usb1 qmpphy node

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 3.05.2023 15:10, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add the USB3+DP Combo QMP PHY port subnodes in the SM8350 SoC DTSI
> to avoid duplication in the devices DTs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
> index ebcb481571c2..d048f4d35c89 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
> @@ -2149,6 +2149,32 @@ usb_1_qmpphy: phy at 88e9000 {
>  			#phy-cells = <1>;
>  
>  			status = "disabled";
> +
> +			ports {
> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				port at 0 {
> +					reg = <0>;
> +
> +					usb_1_qmpphy_out: endpoint {
> +					};
> +				};
> +
> +				port at 1 {
> +					#address-cells = <1>;
> +					#size-cells = <0>;
> +					reg = <1>;
> +
> +					usb_1_qmpphy_usb_ss_in: endpoint at 0 {
> +						reg = <0>;
> +					};
> +
> +					usb_1_qmpphy_dp_in: endpoint at 1 {
> +						reg = <1>;
> +					};
Shouldn't dp be a separate port at 2?

Konrad
> +				};
> +			};
>  		};
>  
>  		usb_2_qmpphy: phy-wrapper at 88eb000 {
>