Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: can: xilinx_can: Add ECC property ‘xlnx,has-ecc’
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Fri Jun 16 03:38:50 PDT 2023
On 16/06/2023 12:13, Goud, Srinivas wrote:
>>>>> xlnx,has-ecc is optional property and added to Xilinx CAN Controller
>>>>> node if ECC block enabled in the HW.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud at amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to introspect the IP core to check if this feature is compiled in?
>>> There is no way(IP registers) to indicate whether ECC feature is enabled or
>> not.
>>
>> Isn't this then deductible from compatible? Your binding claims it is only for
>> AXI CAN, so xlnx,axi-can-1.00.a, even though you did not restrict it in the
>> binding.
> Agree it is only for AXI CAN(xlnx,axi-can-1.00.a) but ECC feature is
> configurable option to the user.
> ECC is added as optional configuration(enable/disable) feature
> to the existing AXI CAN.
Why boards would like not to have ECC? I understand that someone told
you "make it configurable in DTS", but that's not really a reason for
us. Why this is suitable for DTS?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list