Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: can: xilinx_can: Add ECC property ‘xlnx,has-ecc’

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Wed Jun 14 04:11:04 PDT 2023


On 14/06/2023 12:22, Goud, Srinivas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 1:23 PM
>> To: Goud, Srinivas <srinivas.goud at amd.com>
>> Cc: wg at grandegger.com; davem at davemloft.net; edumazet at google.com;
>> kuba at kernel.org; pabeni at redhat.com; gcnu.goud at gmail.com; git (AMD-
>> Xilinx) <git at amd.com>; michal.simek at xilinx.com; linux-can at vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: can: xilinx_can: Add ECC property
>> ‘xlnx,has-ecc’
>>
>> On 12.06.2023 17:12:55, Srinivas Goud wrote:
>>> ECC feature added to Tx and Rx FIFO’s for Xilinx CAN Controller.
>>> Part of this feature configuration and counter registers added in IP
>>> for 1bit/2bit ECC errors.
>>> Please find more details in PG096 v5.1 document.
>>>
>>> xlnx,has-ecc is optional property and added to Xilinx CAN Controller
>>> node if ECC block enabled in the HW.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud at amd.com>
>>
>> Is there a way to introspect the IP core to check if this feature is compiled in?
> There is no way(IP registers) to indicate whether ECC feature is enabled or not.

Isn't this then deductible from compatible? Your binding claims it is
only for AXI CAN, so xlnx,axi-can-1.00.a, even though you did not
restrict it in the binding.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list