[PATCH v2 3/8] dt-bindings: marvell: a38x: add solidrun armada 388 clearfog boards

[Josua Mayer]

Am 26.12.23 um 13:10 schrieb Conor Dooley:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 03:58:14PM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> Am 24.12.23 um 15:42 schrieb Conor Dooley:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 03:38:45PM +0100, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Add DT compatible for SolidRun Armada-388 based Clearfog Base and Pro
>> boards.
>>
>> While they are just two variants, we have 3 device-tree:
>> - armada-388-clearfog.dts
>> - armada-388-clearfog-base.dts
>> - armada-388-clearfog-pro.dts
>>
>> While the first one is identical to the pro variant, the filename is
>> not, and neither are the compatible strings.
>>
>> The first is compatible to armada-380, 385, 388 and
>> solidrun,clearfog-a1.
>> The other two are compatible to the same, plus an additional string
>> including the pro/base as suffix.
>>
>> Add two bindings, one for the explicit pro and base variants using a
>> total of 5 compatibles, and one for the generic name using just 4.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua at solid-run.com><mailto:josua at solid-run.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> There's nothing here that explains to me _why_ there are three sets of
>> compatibles for only two boards. Why is this the case?
>>
>> I have no idea how we ended up with these 3 combinations:
>> clearfog-a1, armada388, ...
>> clearfog-base-a1, clearfog-base-a1, armada388, ...
>> clearfog-pro-a1, clearfog-base-a1, armada388, ...
>> I can only assume it is because these boards are so similar they can boot
>> from each others device-tree without large functional impact.
> I think Krzysztof has dug more into this, but please just create two
> combinations that make sense and have common elements (which they
> already do to be fair). It doesn't really matter if some combination
> that doesn't make sense is used out of tree.

Okay, thanks.
I will create another revision and rewrite descriptions to be more clear,
especially considering questions raised by Krzysztof.

>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>> Note we did end up with 3 individual filenames because the Pro was supported first,
>> without a suffix - and then both were supported with specific suffix.
>>
>>
>> Also, binding patches need to be sent to the devicetree mailing list.
>> get_maintainer.pl should have told you that, no?
>>
>> I will fix it in v3, or do a resend.
>> It did tell me, but I wrongly decided to pick only linux-arm-kernel.